Search this site

At this point, the franchise feels like it should have stopped after the third installment. It’s starting to drift into that Fast & Furious-style territory, too many sequels, all blending together without adding anything meaningful. To its credit, the film sets things up fairly well. There’s a sense early on that it could build toward something worthwhile, especially with the stakes involving Sidney and her family. But that momentum doesn’t hold. The ending, which should have been the payoff, completely falls flat and undermines the buildup. "When a new Ghostface killer emerges in the quiet town where Sidney has built a new life, her darkest fears are realized as her daughter becomes the next target. Determined to protect her family, she must face the horrors of her past to put an end to the bloodshed once and for all."

Going in with no prior knowledge, Wuthering Heights ended up being a mixed experience. The ending ultimately helped elevate my overall rating, but getting there wasn’t always engaging. The acting is undeniably strong, with performances that feel committed and emotionally grounded. The cinematography is another standout, capturing the atmosphere in a way that fits the story’s tone perfectly. That said, the film struggled to hold my interest. At times, it leans too heavily into a cheesy romantic style that didn’t resonate with me. The pacing also drags, making sections feel longer than they needed to be. Combined with a time period that I personally didn’t connect with, it made the overall experience feel somewhat distant and, at times, boring. "Tragedy strikes when Heathcliff falls in love with Catherine Earnshaw, a woman from a wealthy family in 18th-century England."

This was bad like every other Mark Wahlberg film recently, but it still provided some laughs. No need to watch this unless you are desperate for any type of comedy. "Two marketers pitch a bold new condom World Cup sponsorship. After a booze-fuelled scandal, they must outrun chaos to survive."

Planes, Trains and Automobiles is the kind of comedy that just works when you want something easy and comforting. It’s not trying to be anything groundbreaking, but it absolutely hits the spot. The performances from Steve Martin and John Candy carry the film. Their chemistry drives the entire experience, even when some of the acting leans a bit cheesy. That charm, though, is part of what makes it enjoyable, it never takes itself too seriously. In the end, it’s an easy, comfortable watch, the kind of movie you can throw on anytime and enjoy without thinking too much about it. Not a standout, but definitely a good time. " Easily excitable Neal Page (Steve Martin) is somewhat of a control freak. Trying to get home to Chicago to spend Thanksgiving with his wife (Laila Robins) and kids, his flight is rerouted to a distant city in Kansas because of a freak snowstorm, and his sanity begins to fray. Worse yet, he is forced to bunk up with talkative Del Griffith (John Candy), whom he finds extremely annoying. Together they must overcome the insanity of holiday travel to reach their intended destination."

This is a 1989 Steven Soderbergh film and it’s easy to see why it earned critical attention and even an Oscar nomination. The performances are undeniably strong across the board, but as a whole, the film didn’t fully work for me. The acting is the clear highlight. James Spader, in particular, brings a quiet intensity to his role, while Andie MacDowelland Laura San Giacomo add depth to characters navigating complicated emotional territory. There’s a lot happening beneath the surface, and the cast does a great job conveying that tension. Unfortunately, the story itself didn’t hold my attention for most of the runtime. Despite the film’s focus on intimacy and personal conflict, it moves at a slow pace without offering enough intrigue to stay engaging. It’s not until the final stretch that things begin to click and the narrative gains some real momentum. " Ann (Andie MacDowell) is trapped in a sexually and emotionally unfulfilled relationship with her husband, John (Peter Gallagher), a successful but unpleasant lawyer who is sleeping with her sister, Cynthia (Laura San Giacomo). The underlying tensions in the couple's marriage rise to the surface whenGraham (James Spader), a friend of John's from college who's been drifting for nine years, returns to town and videotapes Cynthia and Ann as they talk about their sexual desires."

Starting the Alfred Hitchcock movies with this 1948 film. I'm sure for it's time it was revolutionary but watching it today, I thought it was fine. The biggest thing that stood out is how much it feels like a stage play rather than a traditional movie. That’s not necessarily a flaw. The confined setting and long, uninterrupted takes give the film a theatrical quality that may not resonate as strongly with modern audiences. Of course, considering the limitations and style of cinematography in the late 1940s, that approach makes sense. " Just before hosting a dinner party, Philip Morgan (Farley Granger) and Brandon Shaw (John Dall) strangle a mutual friend to death with a piece of rope, purely as a Nietzsche-inspired philosophical exercise. Hiding the body in a chest upon which they then arrange a buffet dinner, the pair welcome their guests, including the victim's oblivious fiancée (Joan Chandler) and the college professor (James Stewart) whose lectures inadvertently inspired the killing."

I think I’ve reached the point where if Glen Powell is leading a movie, I expect something average. That’s not to say he’s bad, he has charisma, but there’s a sameness to his performances that’s becoming hard to ignore. This was a fun watch overall, but Powell leans a little too heavily into his usual charm. At times, it comes off as overly cheesy, like he’s playing a familiar version of himself rather than fully stepping into a new character. There’s an entertaining core here, and the premise has potential, but it never quite elevates beyond being a light, forgettable experience. It’s enjoyable in the moment, just not especially memorable once it’s over. "A blue-collar protagonist who systematically murders his wealthy, estranged relatives to claim a $28 billion inheritance "

This 2025 Japanese and Chinese-language film delivers striking cinematography alongside a portrayal of the 1937 Nanjing Massacre. It’s a visually compelling yet emotionally heavy experience, with overwhelming grief and brutality. The film doesn’t shy away from its subject matter. It’s dark and filled with scenes of loss and violence that reflect the reality of the time. While difficult to watch at times is what makes it impactful. If you are okay with subtitles, this should be added to your list. " During the 1937 Nanjing Massacre, a postman poses as a photo developer, helping Japanese forces while secretly sheltering Chinese refugees. He later risks his life evacuating them and revealing evidence of the atrocities."

Directed by Bong Joon-ho (best known for Parasite , Snowpiercer , and Mickey 17 ), Memories of Murder remains one of the most critically acclaimed Korean films of the early 2000s, and it’s easy to see why. The acting is excellent across the board, with Song Kang-ho delivering a particularly strong performance that balances dark humor and desperation. The plot is gripping, grounded in true events, and unfolds with a methodical pace. For a 2003 film, the cinematography holds up well and effective in building atmosphere. That said, the film can feel slow at times, especially in the middle stretch. While the suspense is consistently present, the pacing occasionally undercuts the tension. The ending, while thematically fitting, didn’t land as strongly as I had hoped and may leave some viewers wanting more. " In 1986, Park (Song Kang-ho) and Cho (Kim Roi-ha) were two simple-minded detectives assigned to a double murder investigation in a South Korean province. But when the murderer strikes several more times with the same pattern, the detectives realize that they are chasing the country's first documented serial killer. Relying on only their basic skills and tools, Park and Cho attempt to piece together the clues and solve the case in this thriller based on true events."

I’m not sure why I ended up watching this, maybe because it was free on Netflix. Either way, it felt like a complete waste of time. Going in, it already had all the signs of a stinker, and unfortunately, it delivers exactly that. " Best friends Griff and Doug have always dreamed of remaking their all-time favorite movie "Anaconda." When a midlife crisis pushes them to finally go for it, they assemble a crew and head deep into the jungles of the Amazon to start filming. However, life soon imitates art when a gigantic anaconda with a thirst for blood starts hunting them down."

This is the definition of a solid film. With a high-caliber cast led by Chris Hemsworth, it delivers a executed experience that’s easy to follow from start to finish. While the ending feels a bit uncertain and the film lacks deeper substance, it remains an enjoyable, easy watch. It may not leave a lasting impression, but it works well in the moment. " A master thief and an insurance broker join forces for a big heist, while a determined detective pursues them to prevent the multi-million dollar crime."

This was an easy comedy to watch, but it feels aimed at a younger audience and will not work for everyone. The film is short, light, and breezy, making it a simple pick for viewers looking for something undemanding. "High college students face an unexpected journey when they must navigate two flights of stairs to retrieve their pizza delivery, turning a simple task into a surreal adventure while on drugs. "